Hi Ajithan,
Very good set of articles. I enjoyed reading them. Lot of original thinking and lucid write-up.
I especially liked the one of intuition. There is a fair amount of
research going on currently in cognitive psychology on this subject.
I've done a couple of studies in this area. If you wish to, could send
some references about the current thinking in
this line of research. I think you would enjoy reading about "dual
process" theories of cognition, that tries to link tacit-associative
mode of perception and judgement with conscious-analytic mode. Recent
studies in this area try to theorize and test on how
these two modes are not necessarily at tension with each other, but
rather, are constitutive of one another. [Akin to what Poincare once
said: logic is the instrument of demonstration; and intuition, the
instrument of invention. Demonstration and invention
often co-evolve.]
Regarding some of comments that I see in the blog - especially the
one on making falsifiable claims/statements.. ... I think it is better
to ignore them. These are typically made by "bullies" who hold onto a
very idealized notion of science. What is currently
happening in academia is that people's thinking is constrained, as they
try to come up with "testable" hypothesis from the very outset. That
stops them from making long stride associations. Indeed, the "science of
association" is the mother of all sciences.
Yes, falsifiaility is important in science, but that shouldn't in any
way constrain initial theorization. Most modern scientific theories
started with hopelessly un-testable hunches and imaginations. Finding a
way to test it comes much later. So, don't ever
listen to people who ask you to "discipline" yourself and utter only
"falsifiable" statements etc.
I also found this line in your blog about the lack of Indian role
models in Science. While this might be true 20-30 years back, it is no
longer the case. There are a number of Indian scientists - both in
natural, behavioral and social sciences - who are
well renowned in their own fields.
For instance, in Physics, there are people like Ashoke Sen, T.
Padmanabhan and others who have made original contributions. In Math and
Statistics, there are people like C.R. Rao, Anil Nerode, and Thomas
Anantharaman who are revered in their respective
fields. In fact, Anantharaman's work on Bayesian inference is
fundamental to modern statistical theory. In Life Sciences, there are
plenty of prominent figures such as Imran Siddiqui, Sangeeta Bhatia,
Ashtoush Tewari and more. Needless to say about Computer
Science & Engineering, where Indians have made great stride in
making fundamental, paradigm-changing contributions - from
microprocessor design to computational algorithms. Even the current head
of U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) is an Indian - Dr.
Subra Suresh. There are also other important social and behavioral
scientists. Social psychologists such as Nalini Ambadi and Mahzarin
Banaji are doing wonderful research in the area of implicit cognition
and bias. Their research on rapid decision making and
spontaneous social judgement (via the "thin slicing" methodology that
they had created ) is now having a big impact within entire social
sciences. sciences. (see http:// ambadylab.stanford.edu/index. htm and https://implicit. harvard.edu/implicit/).
The issue is that we don't pay any attention to them. Indeed, how
many of us have heard about Venkat Ramakrishnan before he won the Nobel?
Even V.S.Ramachandran was not at all known in India in his heydays,
when he was already a big name in brain-behavior
research. He became popular in India only in the recent few years,
after his mainstream books and TED talks became famous. Other wise, he
would also have remained in the dark.
Most of the people whom I listed above don't write popular books or
give TED talks. Their primary outlet is their specialty journal. But
they do sometimes write in popular scientific magazines and blogs
(Scientific American, Edge.org, thesituationist.wordpress.com
etc.) to a general audience. In this Google age, it is very easy to find and get access to these articles and blogs.
So yes, there are plenty of Indian role models in science. It is up
to you to pick and choose on whom you want to emulate and whom you want
to go beyond...
All the best. And please be in touch.
Regards,
Arvind
Dear Arvind,
Thank you for your appreciation. And thank you for introducing a lot of Indian research scholars and scientists seriously involved in scientific field. seems like I have been gravely ignorant, probably because my reading is largely limited to popular science as of now. I would sure try to follow most of them.
Affectionately
Ajithan.J
no need to take this as a sign of ignorance or anything like that... at your age, i only know the names of cricket players.
ReplyDeleteas a country, we have this hidden inferiority feeling that we haven't achieved much in the sciences. though there is definitely an element of truth to this, one shouldn't get overtly bogged down. i have seen people who got angry/bogged down by this fact slowly become dormant and de-generative, instead of being generative and productive. strange workings of the human mind, i guess!
which is why i thought it is a good idea for a young and upcoming scholar to look at the works of other scientists and scholars who have accomplished something. would give us a frame of reference to work with/work towards..
http://scottbarrykaufman.com/article/study-alert-are-there-geniuses-among-the-apes/
ReplyDeletejust stumbled..thought this will interest you..check this out aji..
thanks forinfo
ReplyDeletewow imsharing
ReplyDeleteWow, cool post. I'd like to write like this too - taking time and real hard work to make a great article... but I put things off too much and never seem to get started. Thanks though. desi tv serials online
ReplyDelete